Parallelized Event Data Management System Based on MT-SNiPER Framework and PODIO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Software framework serves as a skeleton for the offline data processing software for many high energy physics (HEP) experiments. The event data management, including the event data model (EDM), transient event store and data input/output, implements the core functionalities of the framework, and has a great impact on the performance of the entire offline software. Future HEP experiments are generating increasingly large amounts of data, bringing challenges to offline data processing. To address this issue, a common event data management system that supports efficient parallelized data processing applications has been developed based on Software for Non-collider Physics ExpeRiments (SNiPER) common software framework as well as PODIO, a common EDM toolkit for future HEP experiments. In this paper, the implementation of a parallelized event data management (PEDM) system is introduced, including the integration with MT-SNiPER and PODIO, as well as the implementation of GlobalStore to support multi-threaded event processing. Finally, the application and performance evaluation of the data management system in OSCAR (offline software of Super Tau Charm Facility) is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".