MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407011580 · doi:10.1002/9781394182176.ch6

The Influence of the Mouth and Mouthcare on the Body‐Image and Social Interactions of Frail Elders

2025· other· en· W4407011580 on OpenAlexaff
Leeann Donnelly, Laura Hurd Clarke, Alison Phinney, Michael I. MacEntee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyGerontologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes how the mouth and mouthcare affect the social interactions of people as they age and grow frail, drawing particular attention to the concept of body image as a key factor in this relationship. It explains how people assess their appearance and health, and discusses the practical implications of these assessments for dental personnel as they manage the oral health needs and social expectations of people who are frail. Disturbance from oral diseases can have a profoundly disturbing effect on body image, precipitate depression, and predispose to morbid restrictions on social interactions. Dental personnel as active participants on transdisciplinary healthcare teams can alert colleagues to the disabling potential of these disturbances, and offer advice and management strategies to protect the lives of people who are frail and vulnerable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207