MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407013470 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.28.635329

Source Reconstruction Without an MRI using Optically Pumped Magnetometer based Magnetoencephalography

2025· preprint· en· W4407013470 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie Rhodes, Lukas Rier, Elena Boto, Ryan M. Hill, Matthew J. Brookes

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsMagnetoencephalographyMagnetometerNuclear magnetic resonanceComputer scienceComputer visionPhysicsMaterials scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyMagnetic fieldNeuroscienceElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Source modelling in magnetoencephalography (MEG) maps the spatial origins of electrophysiological signals in the brain. Typically, this requires an anatomical MRI scan of the subject’s head, from which a model of the neuromagnetic field (the forward model) is derived. Wearable MEG – based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) – enables MEG measurement from participants who struggle to cope with conventional scanning environments (e.g. children), enabling study of novel cohorts. However, its value is limited if an MRI scan is still required for source modelling. Here we describe a method of warping template MRIs to 3D structured-light scans of the head, to generate “pseudo-MRIs”. We apply our method using data from 20 participants during a sensory task, measuring induced (beta band) responses and whole-brain functional connectivity. Results show that the group average locations of peak task-induced beta modulation were separated by 2.75 mm, when comparing real- and pseudo-MRI approaches. Group averaged time-frequency spectra were also highly correlated (Pearson correlation 0.99) as were functional connectome matrices (0.87), and global connectivity (0.98). In sum, our results demonstrate that source-localized OPM-MEG data, modelled with and without an individual MRI scan can be similar. This will be useful for future studies where MRI data capture is challenging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207