MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407022429 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11835

Susceptible‐infected‐recovered model with stochastic transmission

2025· article· en· W4407022429 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Christian Gouriéroux, Yang Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)VirologyComputer scienceBiologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The susceptible‐infected‐recovered (SIR) model is the cornerstone of epidemiological models. However, this specification depends on two parameters only, which results in its lack of flexibility and explains its difficulty to replicate the volatile reproduction numbers observed in practice. We extend the standard SIR model to a semiparametric SIR model, by first introducing a functional parameter of transmission, and then making this function stochastic. This leads to a SIR model with stochastic transmission. Our model is particularly tractable. We derive its closed‐form solution and use it to compute key indicators, such as the condition (and the threshold) of herd immunity and the timing of the peak. When the population size is finite and the observations are in discrete time, there is also observational uncertainty. We propose a nonlinear state‐space framework under which we analyze the relative magnitudes of the observational and intrinsic uncertainties during the evolution of the epidemic. We emphasize the lack of robustness of the notion of herd immunity when the SIR model is time‐discretized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207