MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407025222 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3537803

AAV Deployment in IoT Networks: A Codebook-Based Reinforcement Learning Approach

2025· article· en· W4407025222 on OpenAlexafffund
MohammadMahdi Ghadaksaz, Mobeen Mahmood, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHuawei Technologies
KeywordsCodebookComputer scienceReinforcement learningSoftware deploymentInternet of ThingsComputer networkArtificial intelligenceDistributed computingComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores a multiuser massive multiple-input-multiple-output (MU-mMIMO) system that incorporates an autonomous aerial vehicle (AAV) as a decode-and-forward (DF) relay between the base station (BS) and multiple Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The primary goal is to maximize the overall achievable rate (AR) by introducing a novel framework that integrates joint hybrid beamforming (HBF) with AAV deployment in dynamic MU-mMIMO IoT systems. Specifically, considering the geometry-based millimeter-wave (mmWave) channel model for both links, the radio frequency (RF) stages are configured to minimize the number of RF chains by utilizing slow time-varying angular information, while the baseband (BB) stages are developed using reduced-dimension effective channel matrices. Subsequently, deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG), a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm with continuous action space, is developed to train the AAV for its deployment. By employing a customized reward function, the RL agent learns an optimal AAV deployment policy capable of adapting to both static and dynamic environments. Then, a novel low-complexity DDPG codebook-based AAV deployment (DDPG-C-AD) is proposed, consisting of an offline agent training phase, and an online AAV deployment prediction to achieve maximum AR. The illustrative results show that the proposed DDPG-C-AD can attain a performance close to the DDPG-based solution in both static and dynamic environments while reducing the runtime by 99%. This makes the DDPG codebook-based solution a promising implementation for real-time online applications in AAV-assisted MU-mMIMO IoT systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207