MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407027568 · doi:10.1016/j.eats.2025.103439

Revision of Failed Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction Fixed With Suture Button to Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction Fixed With Screw Fixation

2025· article· en· W4407027568 on OpenAlexaff
Jawaher Mohammed Alkhateeb, Lasha Sherazadishvili, Felicia Licht, Cathy Coady, Ivan Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueArthroscopy Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryFibrous jointFixation (population genetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR) is an evolving technique for addressing recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Despite advances from the original surgical technique, the use of button fixation has raised considerable concerns because of higher rates of clinical failure, necessitating revision procedures. This article describes revision of AAGR using screw fixation after failed primary AAGR with button fixation. We outline a stepwise approach to guide the decision-making process and identify perioperative technical challenges in revising a previously reconstructed glenoid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthroscopy TechniquesSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207