MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effectiveness of three-week rehabilitation programs in improving mobility of patients with frailty syndrome: a subgroup analysis of the multicenter prospective study «POSTSCRIPTUM»

2024· article· en· W4407034151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
О. Н. Ткачева, Н. К. Рунихина, I. P. Malaya, Н. В. Шарашкина, S. N. Lysenkov, M. S. Arefieva, E. E. Popov

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Geriatric Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationSubgroup analysisMedicineMulticenter studyGerontologyPhysical therapyInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The concept of frailty suggests the potential reversibility of this syndrome. Research indicated that geriatric rehabilitation programs aimed at maintaining mobility and functional independence reduce the frequency of repeated hospitalizations. AIM: To study the specifics of geriatric status to assess the potential effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in improving mobility and functional independence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the data obtained in the open prospective study «POSTSCRIPTUM» (Protocol of Geriatric Rehabilitation in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older Living in Moscow Boarding Houses or Nursing Homes). The analysis included 465 patients (82% women, mean age 78.6 ± 7.6 years). For the analysis, patients were divided into two groups depending on whether there was an improvement in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score of at least 1 point following the rehabilitation program: groups «ΔSPPB ≥ 1» and «ΔSPPB < 1», respectively. A comparative analysis of baseline parameters and the dynamics of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)results were performed upon completing the 21-day geriatric rehabilitation programs. Patients with a baseline maximum SPPB score («SPPB = 12», n = 112; 43%) were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: The «ΔSPPB ≥1» group included 202 (43%) patients, and the «ΔSPPB < 1» group included 263 (57%) patients. After excluding patients with SPPB = 12 from the analysis set, the proportion of patients in the «ΔSPPB ≥1» group was 57.3%. At baseline, the comparison groups did not differ in gender, body mass index, education level, marital status, prevalence of noncommunicable diseases or CGA results. The mean age was 78.7 ± 6.74 years in the «ΔSPPB ≥1» group and 81.2 ± 8.32 years in the «ΔSPPB < 1» group (p < 0.01). Both groups showed positive dynamics in the results of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, GDS-15, Insomnia Severity Index, and VAS scales. However, intergroup comparison revealed no differences in these indicators. The groups differed in dynamometry results: in the «ΔSPPB ≥1» group, they improved from 16.7 ± 6 kg to 18.0 ± 6.2 kg between Visits 1 and 2, p < 0.001 (intergroup delta comparison p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The subgroup analysis results indicate that the effectiveness of rehabilitation depends not only on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics but also on the initial geriatric status as determined by CGA. Comprehensive 21-day geriatric rehabilitation programs tailored to CGA results are effective in improving mobility, muscle strength, psychoemotional state, and sleep quality. However, the rate and magnitude of the effect on various domains may vary among patients with different baseline statuses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Geriatric MedicineSame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207