MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407035782 · doi:10.61838/kman.psynexus.1.1.2

Validation of an Educational Counseling Model Based on Dawis' Work Adjustment Theory and Its Effectiveness on Motivation and Psychological Capital of University Entrance Exam StudentsMohammad

2023· article· en· W4407035782 on OpenAlexaff
Mahbobeh Hojjati, Zohreh Zadhasn

Bibliographic record

VenueKMAN Counseling and Psychology Nexus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyApplied psychologyWork (physics)Capital (architecture)Psychological counselingSocial psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aimed to validate the conceptual model of educational counseling based on Dawis' Work Adjustment Theory and to examine its effectiveness on the motivation and psychological capital of university entrance exam students. This research was a mixed-methods study, where the qualitative part utilized conceptual modeling based on content analysis according to the conventional design method, with texts as its instrument. The results of this part indicated that among the concepts of this theory, personality styles containing four dimensions: speed, effort, persistence, and response pattern, were identified as the best concepts for educational counseling. These concepts were selected from this theory, and the conceptual model of educational counseling based on Dawis' Work Adjustment Theory was extracted. The quantitative part was a quasi-experimental or pretest-posttest design with a control group. The sample consisted of 32 female students in the twelfth grade selected by convenience sampling from a high school in Najafabad and then non-randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received an educational package in 8 sessions of 90 minutes each. The research instruments included Harter's Academic Motivation (1981) and Luthans' Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ) (2007). Both groups were evaluated in three stages: pretest, posttest, and follow-up. Descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential (analysis of covariance) statistics were used to examine and analyze the data. The results showed that this method was effective in improving motivation and psychological capital. From the qualitative part, the conceptual model of educational counseling based on Dawis' Work Adjustment Theory was extracted. According to the findings of this study, it can be said that the conceptual model of educational counseling based on Dawis' Work Adjustment Theory is a suitable method for increasing the motivation and psychological capital of university entrance exam students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKMAN Counseling and Psychology NexusSame topicEducation and Islamic StudiesFrench-language works237,207