MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407039855 · doi:10.3390/disabilities5010014

Occupational and Physical Therapy Interventions for Young Children with Developmental Central Hypotonia: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

2025· article· en· W4407039855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDisabilities · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypotoniaPsychological interventionMedicineCINAHLPhysical therapyCerebral palsySystematic reviewMEDLINEIntervention (counseling)PediatricsMassagePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developmental central hypotonia describes children with decreased muscle tone due to non-progressive central damage, and includes many genetic conditions (e.g., Down, Prader–Willi or Joubert syndromes etc.), cerebral palsy with hypotonia as the main motor type, developmental delays and congenital hypotonia with favorable outcome. This umbrella review aims to systematically describe the best available evidence for interventions that may be used by early intervention therapists in home and community settings. We conducted electronic searches in PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, EBM Reviews and PEDro during August 2024. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias were rated by all authors, and included reviews were compared and contrasted. Eight systematic reviews (SRs) and two overviews of interventions for children with developmental central hypotonia under 6 years of age were identified through databases and other search methods. Four SRs and one overview evaluated treadmill training, one SR evaluated use of orthotics, another evaluated therapeutic exercise, and two SRs and one overview evaluated a range of occupational and physical therapy interventions. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias of included reviews were variable. Most evidence is related to children with Down syndrome, with few studies addressing children with central hypotonia from other causes. Low-quality (GRADE) evidence supports treadmill training to promote walking onset in children with Down syndrome. Motor, sensorimotor, orthotics, positioning, mobility and infant massage interventions are supported by positive but low- or very-low-quality evidence, and recommendations in favor are all conditional. Primary research on effectiveness of all occupational and physical therapy early interventions for children with developmental central hypotonia from all causes is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it