An In-Depth Comparative Study of Quantum-Classical Encoding Methods for Network Intrusion Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In today’s rapidly evolving cyber landscape, the growing sophistication of attacks, including the rise of zero-day exploits, poses critical challenges for network intrusion detection. Traditional Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) often struggle with the complexity and high dimensionality of modern cyber threats. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) seamlessly integrates the computational power of quantum computing with the adaptability of machine learning, offering an innovative approach to solving intricate and high-dimensional challenges. A key factor in QML’s performance is the method used to encode classical data into quantum states, as it defines how data is represented and processed in quantum circuits. QML offers promising advances for IDS, particularly through hybrid quantum-classical models. This study presents an in-depth comparative analysis of quantum-classical data encoding techniques for QML-based IDS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively evaluate the performance impact of different quantum encoding methods and provide a thorough evaluation of their impacts on the overall model performances. To achieve this, we first present a comprehensive evaluation of quantum and classical data encoding techniques, focusing on four key encoding techniques namely, Amplitude Embedding, Angle Embedding, Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial (IQP) Encoding, and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) Embedding. Then, we develop a hybrid quantum-classical QML model to analyze how each encoding affects classification performance for malicious traffic. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments using two well-known, real-world network attack datasets to assess the accuracy and efficiency of each encoding approach. Our obtained results show notable differences in classification accuracy, underscoring the importance of encoding choice in optimizing QML-based IDS. This study aims to advance the application of quantum methodologies in network security by identifying effective encoding strategies for intrusion detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".