MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407052200 · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100626

Graphene-based materials and technologies for the treatment of PFAS in water: A review of recent developments

2025· review· en· W4407052200 on OpenAlex
Amir Hossein Behroozi, Louise Meunier, Arghavan Mirahsani, Pascale Champagne, E. Hosseini Koupaie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hazardous Materials Advances · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGrapheneNanotechnologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are anthropogenic chemicals used in various commercial and industrial applications. As an emerging global concern due to their ubiquity and toxicity, PFAS are the focus of ongoing environmental research. Although production is partially limited by regulations, PFAS are released in water, soil, and air worldwide. Considering their deleterious impacts on wildlife and humans, developing strategies to capture and remove PFAS is crucial. Graphene materials may be advantageously applied to PFAS remediation. A survey of graphene-based materials and technologies used to treat PFAS-contaminated water is presented in this review. First, the general concept of PFAS and their related environmental and health problems are outlined. Then, the features and structures of graphene-containing materials, including graphene quantum dots, graphene oxide (GO), reduced-GO, carbon nanotubes, and graphene nanoplatelets, are described. Finally, prevailing PFAS treatment techniques, i.e., adsorption, advanced oxidation processes, membrane separation, electrochemical separation, and hybrid applications, are described along with the mechanisms involved. Currently, PFAS cannot be effectively treated to the very low regulatory guidelines (less than one part per billion for certain compounds) using any current methods because of incomplete removal, impractical applications, or operating costs. Barriers remain, including adsorbent regeneration, membrane fouling, system scale up, and toxic by-product generation. Integrating graphene-based materials, especially graphene nanoplatelets, into treatment may address these problems if PFAS can be removed completely without secondary contamination. Further research is required to achieve effective PFAS removal. However, health and environmental risks remain associated with PFAS and graphene-based materials, which must be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it