QUARTER-LIFE CRISIS PHENOMENON (VIEWS AND SOLUTION ACCORDING TO ISLAMIC PSYCHOLOGY)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter-life crisis is a feeling of doubt, fear, and decision about facing the future related to personal matters or social relations with other people, including careers, friendships, family, and even love life that is experienced by the age of 20 years. A Quarter-life crisis is synonymous with fear, anxiety, anxiety, doubt, and decision about facing the future. This study aims to find out how the quarter-life crisis is in the view of Islamic psychology and its solutions. This research was conducted using a qualitative method with a literature study approach. In this study, the series of activities are concerned with collecting library data, reading and taking notes, then processing the appropriate and necessary information to answer the formulation of the problem to be solved. As for the results of this study in Islam, fear is called khauf. Khauf and fear because this quarter life crisis is different because khauf is meant only for Allah. The solutions to overcome the quarter-life crisis are: Increasing spiritual intelligence, increasing religiosity (intelligence and obedience to Allah), Prayer Worship, reading the Alquran regularly understanding its meaning, and being kind to Allah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".