Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan, Perlindungan Anak, Pengendalian Penduduk Dan Keluarga Berencana Kabupaten Kapuas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to: 1) Analyze employee job satisfaction at the Department of Women's Empowerment, Child Protection, Population Control, and Family Planning (P3APPKB) in Kapuas Regency, 2) Identify factors hindering job satisfaction, and 3) Evaluate solutions implemented to overcome these challenges. The study adopts a descriptive qualitative approach using interviews, observations, and documentation. Data were analyzed based on Miles and Huberman's stages: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that employee job satisfaction at the P3APPKB Department in Kapuas Regency is suboptimal. Hindering factors include an unconducive work environment, heavy workload, high work pressure, and insufficient compensation. Solutions implemented include fair compensation, collective workload distribution, improvements in the work atmosphere, leadership motivation, and reducing monotonous and unproductive tasks. This study provides valuable insights for improving employee welfare within the department. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: 1) Menganalisis kepuasan kerja pegawai Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan, Perlindungan Anak, Pengendalian Penduduk dan KB (P3APPKB) Kabupaten Kapuas, 2) Mengidentifikasi faktor penghambat kepuasan kerja, dan 3) Mengevaluasi solusi yang diambil untuk mengatasi faktor penghambat tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Data dianalisis berdasarkan tahapan Miles dan Huberman: reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepuasan kerja pegawai di Dinas P3APPKB Kabupaten Kapuas belum optimal. Faktor penghambat meliputi lingkungan kerja yang kurang kondusif, beban kerja berat, tekanan kerja tinggi, serta kompensasi yang kurang memadai. Solusi yang diterapkan antara lain pemberian balas jasa yang adil, pembagian beban kerja secara kolektif, perbaikan suasana kerja, dorongan motivasi pimpinan, serta pengurangan sifat pekerjaan monoton dan tidak produktif. Penelitian ini memberikan gambaran penting bagi perbaikan kesejahteraan pegawai di lingkungan dinas terkait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".