Calculation of Glow Discharge Parameters in a Supersonic Axisymmetric Helium Flow
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The parameters of a glow discharge in helium with a nonuniform distribution of the density of neutral particles along the discharge gap have been calculated for a one-dimensional axisymmetric geometry. This formulation of the problem corresponds to the condition of generating a discharge between a Laval nozzle with a central body, which is the anode, and a ring cathode located coaxially to the central body at low pressures. In this case, a supersonic gas flow is generated through the Laval nozzle, which creates an increased gas pressure near the central body (anode), and high vacuum is maintained outside the supersonic jet. Thus, the internal structure of this discharge will depend on the density of gas particles in different regions of the interelectrode space. It has been established that this method of organizing a glow discharge in a supersonic gas flow makes it possible to control the spatial distribution of the internal characteristics of the discharge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it