MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407063725 · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.160158

Synergistic Lewis Acid-Base pair electrolyte Configuration enables reversible zinc anode via multiple electrostatic interactions

2025· article· en· W4407063725 on OpenAlexafffund
Wenting Jia, Zhixiao Xu, Yimei Chen, Pengge Ning, Hongbin Cao, Xiaolei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship CouncilCanada First Research Excellence FundUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsElectrolyteAnodeZincLewis acids and basesBase (topology)ChemistryInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringMaterials scienceCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryElectrodePhysical chemistryCatalysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A synergistic Lewis acid-base pair additive, combining citric acid and caffeine, enhances electrochemical performance in aqueous zinc-ion batteries. The tailored additive reconfigures hydrogen bonding for improved Zn 2+ de-solvation, restricts active water, meanwhile co-adsorbs on the zinc anode, suppressing side reactions and promoting uniform Zn 2+ deposition, offering a cost-effective solution to the limitations of single additive. • An innovative Lewis acid-base pair (LABP) additive strategy was first proposed. • Strengthened hydrogen bonds between LABP and active water facilities Zn 2+ dynamics. • LABP adsorbs synergistically onto the zinc surface, forming an LABP-anode interface. • Electrostatic interactions among LABP components, H 2 O, and zinc ensure performance. Aqueous zinc batteries hold significant promise for grid-level energy storage due to low cost and high safety, but dendrite growth and water-induced side reactions limit widespread adoption. Electrolyte additives have emerged as a feasible solution, yet commonly used Lewis-acids, Lewis-bases or zwitterions often lack cost-effectiveness and rational design. Here, we introduce a synergic Lewis acid-base pair (LABP) additive, combining citric acid and caffeine, to address these challenges. While citric acid and caffeine individually causes corrosion and precipitation, together they leverage electrostatic interactions to stabilize the electrolyte by reconfiguring hydrogen bonding to impede proton transport, different from prior additives with first-shell coordination features. Additionally, the additive enhances the LABP co-chemisorbed anode interphase and improves zinc deposition via multiple H 2 O-shielded nucleation sites, as evidenced by experiments and computational simulations. Consequently, the LABP achieves 99.80 % coulombic efficiency in half cells and enables stable operation for 2,800 h at 1.0 mA cm −2 in symmetric cells. In practical zinc-iodine full cells, the LABP extends cycle life to over 680 cycles with high-loading cathodes (13 mg cm −2 ), low N/P ratio (2.6), and lean electrolyte, significantly outperforming cells without the additive. This LABP approach provides new avenues for electrolyte design in zinc-ion and other battery systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering JournalSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207