MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407065722 · doi:10.36880/j04.1.0136

Legal and Economic Consequences of International Migration

2025· article· en· W4407065722 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dilek Yılmazcan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Eurasian Economies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEconomic geographyLaw and economicsGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migration is the movement of people from one place to another. This phenomenon occurs for various reasons, including war, climate change, drought, and economic and political factors. It encompasses more than just the movement of people; it also includes the seasonal movement of birds, fish, and other animals. This phenomenon has persisted throughout history, including the migration of tribes in the fourth century due to drought and climate change. The economic and social dimensions of international migration have come under scrutiny. The rise of globalization has contributed to an increase in international migration, with certain countries, such as the USA, Canada, and Australia, implementing legal immigration policies motivated by economic considerations. Illegal migration from underdeveloped countries has reached substantial levels due to factors such as wars, food shortages, and climate change. This study aims to examine the causes of international human migration, the various types of migration, and the migration systems. The discussion will cover migration processes, agreements between receiving and sending countries, and the legal and economic consequences of migration. It will also address the challenges experienced by our nation as a source and destination for immigration. Migration entails challenges, but it also generates benefits in nations with the right legal frameworks and social measures. This study will cover both sociological and liberal perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Eurasian EconomiesSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207