Optimal CNN Model for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Detection using Particle Swarm Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder with significant health risks. It is characterized by the narrowing of the upper airway during sleep, leading to vibrations in the airway structures and the production of snoring sounds. Recently, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been leveraged to extract meaningful features from snoring sound data, enabling early and accurate detection of OSA. The effectiveness of these neural network optimizations depends on the starting values of the model, the gradient algorithm used, and the complexity of the problem. This study introduces an improved Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) strategy that linearly adjusts the learning rate coefficient to enhance accuracy and convergence speed. Our approach was evaluated on a collected and pre-processed dataset based on the PSG-Audio database. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the conventional optimization algorithm and existing PSO techniques, achieving a remarkable accuracy of 99.1%. These findings confirm the potential of our optimized model for OSA detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it