MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407066711 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-97-rc1

Comment on egusphere-2025-97

2025· peer-review· en· W4407066711 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsUniversité LavalCenter for Northern StudiesGeneral Dynamics (Canada)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Grand Lake, located in Labrador, at the northeastern margin of North America, is a deep lacustrine basin that contains a well-preserved annual laminations record spanning the interval 493 to 2016 CE (1524 years). The chronology of this new varved sequence is established from layer counting of high-resolution images of thin sections. Radiometric dating (137Cs and 14C) validates the reliability of the varve chronology. Varve thickness is significantly correlated (r = 0.38) with the total precipitation recorded at the nearest weather station Goose A. The varve thickness series reveals high values during the 1050–1225 CE period, that is corresponding to the Medieval Climate Anomaly, whereas the 15th–19th centuries, related to the Little Ice Age, shows low values. The teleconnections between several Goose A instrumental data series and some modes of climate variability such as the winter Greenland Blocking (negative North-Atlantic Oscillation) and the significant correlations between our varve thickness record and three other Northern Hemisphere high-resolution proxy records suggest that the Grand Lake record tracks North-Western Atlantic large-scale mode of hydroclimate variability over the past ~1500 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0170.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3150.226

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Russian Policy Studies→French-language works237,207→