MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diavik Waste Rock Project: Post-emplacement investigation of sulfide weathering from a deconstructed experimental waste-rock pile

2025· article· en· W4407069736 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Colleen Atherton, David Wilson, Steven P. Holland, Katherine E. Raymond, David Barsi, Jordan Zak, Leslie Smith, David C. Sego, Richard T. Amos, Doğan Paktunç, Carol J. Ptacek, David W. Blowes

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Geochemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaNatural Resources CanadaCarleton UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWeatheringPileGeologyGeochemistrySulfideGeotechnical engineeringMining engineeringMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deconstruction of a 15 m high low-sulfide (0.035 wt% S) experimental waste-rock pile was conducted to obtain a dense, spatially located sample set for characterization of the solid-phase mineralogy, microbiological community composition, and pore-water geochemistry. The experimental test pile, located in northern Canada, was deconstructed 8 years after construction. Pore-water with low pH was generally associated with elevated concentrations of SO 4 and dissolved metals. Regions of differing pH were present within the test pile, indicating heterogeneous distribution of sulfide and carbonate minerals. Most probable number analysis showed that neutrophilic sulfur oxidizing bacteria were the most consistently prolific of populations associated with acid mine drainage at the time of deconstruction. The mineralogical evolution was examined through comparison of unweathered samples collected at the time of pile construction to weathered samples collected during the deconstruction phase. This analysis indicated that the C content of the waste rock was depleted, but the total S content of the waste rock remained relatively unchanged. Neutralization potential ratios calculated using C and total S indicate that regions of low paste pH (as low as 4.0) were generally consistent with the presence of material classified as potentially acid generating or of uncertain acid generating potential. The deconstruction study shows that variable conditions exist within the test pile (e.g., sharp changes in pH over a few meters) suggesting that waste-rock heterogeneity has influenced the geochemical evolution of the pore water within the test pile. • Deconstruction of a 15 m low-sulfide experimental waste-rock pile conducted to obtain a dense, spatially located sample set. • Heterogeneity in mineralogical distribution influenced the geochemical evolution of the pore water within the test pile. • Comparison of total S and sulfide S indicates the importance of considering S source in acid-base accounting. • The greater reactivity of finer particle-size fractions necessitates their consideration in waste rock characterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied GeochemistrySame topicMine drainage and remediation techniquesFrench-language works237,207