A novel water‐soluble nano‐additive incorporated to <scp>PPSU</scp> membrane for textile dye removal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In order to develop a polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) membrane for the removal of textile dyes, a novel water‐soluble known as partly cross‐linked nanoparticles graft copolymer (PCLNPG) is presented in this study as a pore forming agent. In order to fully investigate its effects on properties of the membrane surface, the morphology, and the porosity, and performance, the PCLNPG concentration in the PPSU solution was changed. The results showed that the novel membrane's hydrophilicity and porosity enhanced when it was made using a 0.75 wt.% PCLNPG. To investigate the impact of PCLNPG nanoparticles on the characterization of the novel nanocomposite, a variety of testing methods were utilized. Additionally, longer finger‐like pores and a more porous structure were created when the PCLNPG content increased. However, the highest values of water flux and Congo red (CR) dye rejection was 147.05 L ∙ m −2 ∙ h −1 and 98.59%, respectively. According to results, treating textile wastewater with PPSU/PCLNPG membranes could be a beneficial choice due to its performance features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".