Demixing and Analysis of Complex Biological Raman Hyperspectra Based on Peak Fitting, Amplitude Trend Clustering, and Spectrum Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To better interpret the Raman spectra from mammalian cells, it is often desirable to reduce their complexity by decomposing them into the spectral contributions from individual macromolecules or types of macromolecules. Diverse methods exist for demixing complex spectra, each with different benefits and drawbacks. However, some methods require a library of component spectra that might not be available, while others are hampered by noise and peak congestion that includes many proximal overlapping peaks. Through rapid fitting of individual peaks in every spectrum of a Raman hyperspectral data set, we have obtained individual peak parameters from which we determined the trends for all the peak amplitudes. We then grouped similar trends with k -means clustering. Then we used the peak parameters of all the peaks in a given cluster to reconstruct a spectrum representative of that cluster. This method produced spectra that were less distorted by unrelated overlapping peaks or noise, were less congested than those in the hyperspectral set, and thereby improved peak identification and macromolecule recognition. We have demonstrated the application of the method with Raman spectra from a perchlorate–polystyrene model system and extended it to complex spectra from methanol-fixed mammalian cells. We were able to recover independent spectra of perchlorate and polystyrene in the model system and spectra pertaining to individual macromolecular types (proteins, nucleic acids, lipids) from the mammalian cell data. We discuss how imperfections in spectral preprocessing and peak fitting can adversely affect the results. In summary, we have provided a proof-of-concept for a novel mixture resolution method with different attributes than extant ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".