Transient flow-induced deformation of cancer cells in microchannels: a general computational model and experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, the present authors proposed a three-dimensional computational model for the transit of suspended cancer cells through a microchannel (Wang et al. in Biomech Model Mechanobiol 22: 1129-1143, 2023). The cell model takes into account the three major subcellular components: A viscoelastic membrane that represents the lipid bilayer supported by the underlying cell cortex, a viscous cytoplasm, and a nucleus modelled as a smaller microcapsule. The cell deformation and its interaction with the surrounding fluid were solved by an immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method. The computational model accurately recovered the transient flow-induced deformation of the human leukaemia HL-60 cells in a constricted channel. However, as a general modelling framework, its applicability to other cell types in different flow geometries remains unknown, due to the lack of quantitative experimental data. In this study, we conduct experiments of the transit of human prostate cancer (PC-3) and leukaemia (K-562) cells, which represent solid and liquid tumour cell lines, respectively, through two distinct microchannel geometries, each dominated by shear and extension flow. We find that the two cell lines have qualitatively similar flow-induced dynamics. Comparisons between experiments and numerical simulations suggest that our model can accurately predict the transient cell deformation in both geometries, and that it can serve as a general modelling framework for the dynamics of suspended cancer cells in microchannels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".