MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407080182 · doi:10.47604/ijs.3205

Impact of Work-Life Balance Policies on Family Relationships in Canada

2025· article· en· W4407080182 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emma Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sociology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWork-Family Balance Challenges
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork–life balanceBalance (ability)Work (physics)SociologyDemographic economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsPsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of work-life balance policies on family relationships in Canada. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Work-life balance policies in Canada, such as flexible working hours, parental leave, and telecommuting, have significantly improved family relationships. Research indicates that employees with access to these policies report higher satisfaction in their family roles, with 72% noting improved communication and quality time with family members (Statistics Canada, 2021). Flexible scheduling allows parents to actively participate in child-rearing and household responsibilities, fostering stronger bonds. Additionally, extended parental leave benefits have positively influenced early childhood development and parental well-being. However, challenges persist, as some employees feel pressured to maintain high productivity while working remotely, potentially blurring the boundaries between work and family life. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Role theory, conservation of resources (COR) theory & work-family border theory may be used to anchor future studies on analyze the impact of work-life balance policies on family relationships in Canada. Organizations should prioritize the implementation of flexible work policies that go beyond merely offering remote work options or paid leave, ensuring that these policies are designed to accommodate the diverse needs of employees. Policymakers should consider expanding and standardizing work-life balance policies across sectors and regions to ensure that all workers have equitable access to family leave, flexible working arrangements, and affordable childcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of SociologySame topicWork-Family Balance ChallengesFrench-language works237,207