Complete peer-reviewed articles from the general section of Transnational Literature, November 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Literary historians in Nigeria are wont to credit Niyi Osundare with being the leading light or champion of a new kind of poetry, a poetry fundamentally different both in thematic concerns and style from that of the preceding generation of the so-called Ibadan-Nsukka school of Nigerian poetry.However, as some critics have argued, every age has a way of producing its own human medium through which it expresses its peculiar socio-cultural spiritus mundi.Accordingly, Osundare arrived on the literary scene at a time which shaped and prepared him for the task of freeing up poetry from the prison-house of obscurity in which the Soyinka generation was said to have put it.The socio-cultural and historical background or context of Osundare's emergencefamily, schooling, village setting, prevailing ideology, et ceterawent a long way in moulding and shaping him for the kind of poetry for which he has come to be known, namely: the poetry of performance.But before we go into details of his unique kind of poetry, it is proper for us to, first and foremost, pause to reflect on the shaping/gestative impact of these features of his development both as a man and, more to our purpose, a poet.Niyi Osundare was born to Ariyoosu Osundare, poet, singer, drummer, and farmer, and Fasimia, 'Indigo Fingers/Weaver of fabrics and fables'. 1 Clearly, Osundare has inherited his parents' artistic predilections and creative nous as it is very easy to make the connection between his own prodigious oeuvre and his parentage.Also, he was born and bred in an Ikere-Ekiti, famed for collectivism or a communitarian ethos, 2 a primal communalism which fertilised his mind to receive the Afrocentric teaching he received at school, notably at the University of Ibadan under the late Professor Oyin Ogunba, who during the heyday of colonial (mis)education swam against the eddies of popular opinion by introducing his charges to the beauties and literary qualities of African oral literature.3 Thus, as part of the momentous wave of the decolonisation project, Osundare, alongside his fellow post-Civil War poets, embraced the Leninist-Marxist ideology which was sweeping large swathes of the so-called Third World and the rest of the developing world.4 His ideological affiliation was only deepened by his sojourn in Leeds, UK and York, Toronto (Canada) where he had travelled for further studies.This ideological intercourse between Africa and the West naturally bred in Osundare a good sense of nativism and cosmopolitanism, or, if you please, you may call it internationalism and neotraditionalism.These aforementioned elements of the poet's formative years seemed to have predisposed him to reject and revolt against certain aspects of 'tradition' as he decided to create his own unique brand of Afro-centric, orally-informed poetry.What do we mean by 'Tradition' in this regard?Simply put, 'Tradition' here implies the sum of the pre-existing body of both written and non-written forms of poetry to which the living poet stands as heir or inheritor.5 Therefore, 'Tradition' approximates to both oral and written Yoruba poetry, African poetry in English expression and non-African poetry in English.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.655 | 0.543 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".