MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407089320 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00483

An open access resource for marmoset neuroscientific apparatus

2025· article· en· W4407089320 on OpenAlexaff
Isabela Zimmermann Rollin, Daniel Papoti, Mitchell Bishop, Diego Szczupak, Michael R. Corigliano, T. Kevin Hitchens, Bei Zhang, Sarah K. A. Pell, Simeon S. Guretse, Audrey Dureux, Takeshi Murai, Stacey J. Sukoff Rizzo, L. Martyn Klassen, Peter Zeman, Kyle M. Gilbert, Ravi S. Menon, Meng Kuan Lin, Stefan Everling, Afonso C. Silva, David J. Schaeffer

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsMarmosetResource (disambiguation)PsychologyComputer scienceNeuroscienceCognitive scienceBusinessBiologyComputer networkEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

) for neuroscientific inquiry has grown precipitously over the past two decades. Despite windfalls of grant support from funding initiatives in North America, Europe, and Asia to model human brain diseases in the marmoset, marmoset-specific apparatus are of sparse availability from commercial vendors and thus are often developed and reside within individual laboratories. Through our collective research efforts, we have designed and vetted myriad designs for awake or anesthetized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), as well as focused ultrasound (FUS), electrophysiology, optical imaging, surgery, and behavior in marmosets across the age-span. This resource makes these designs openly available, reducing the burden of de novo development across the marmoset field. The computer-aided-design (CAD) files are publicly available through the Marmoset Brain Connectome (MBC) resource (https://www.marmosetbrainconnectome.org/apparatus/) and include dozens of downloadable CAD assemblies, software and online calculators for marmoset neuroscience. In addition, we make available a variety of vetted touchscreen and task-based fMRI code and stimuli. Here, we highlight the online interface and the development and validation of a few yet unpublished resources: software to automatically extract the head morphology of a marmoset from a CT and produce a 3D printable helmet for awake neuroimaging, and the design and validation of 8-channel and 14-channel receive arrays for imaging deep structures during anatomical and functional MRI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4220.261

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImaging NeuroscienceSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207