MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407093522 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf127

ACACIAS I: element abundance labels for 192 stars in the dwarf galaxy NGC 6822

2025· article· en· W4407093522 on OpenAlexafffund
Melissa Ness, J. Trevor Mendel, Sven Buder, Adam Wheeler, Alexander P. Ji, Luka Mijnarends, Kim A. Venn, Else Starkenburg, Ryan Leaman, Kathryn Grasha, Sarah Aquilina

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAustralian Research CouncilNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean School of OncologyAustralian National UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsDwarf galaxyAstrophysicsStarsGalaxyIrregular galaxyAstronomyAbundance (ecology)Dwarf spheroidal galaxyInteracting galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The element abundances of local group galaxies connect enrichment mechanisms to galactic properties and serve to contextualize the Milky Way’s abundance distributions. Individual stellar spectra in nearby galaxies can be extracted from integral field unit (IFU) data, and provide a means to take an abundance census of the local group. We introduce a programme that leverages $R=1800$, $\mathrm{SNR}=15$, IFU resolved spectra from the multi unit spectroscopic explorer . We deploy the data-driven modelling approach for labelling stellar spectra with stellar parameters and abundances, of The Cannon, on resolved stars in NGC 6822. We construct our model for The Cannon using $\approx$19 000 Milky Way lamost spectra with apogee labels. We report six inferred abundance labels (denoted $\ell _\mathrm{X}$), for 192 NGC 6822 disc stars, precise to $\approx$0.15 dex. We validate our generated spectral models provide a good fit to the data, including at individual atomic line features. We infer mean abundances of $\ell _\mathrm{[Fe/H]} = -0.90 \pm 0.03$, $\ell _\mathrm{[Mg/Fe]} = -0.01 \pm 0.01$, $\ell _\mathrm{[Mn/Fe]} = -0.22 \pm 0.02$, $\ell _\mathrm{[Al/Fe]} = -0.33 \pm 0.03$, $\ell _\mathrm{[C/Fe]} =-0.43 \pm 0.03$, $\ell _\mathrm{[N/Fe]} =0.18 \pm 0.03$. These abundance labels are similar to those of dwarf galaxies observed by apogee, and the lower enhancements for NGC 6822 compared to the Milky Way are consistent with expectations. This approach supports a new era in extragalactic archaeology of characterizing the local group enrichment diversity using low-resolution, low signal to noise ratio IFU resolved spectra. Furthermore, we conclude that it is feasible to build a model based on spectra observed with one instrument and apply it to spectra obtained with another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→