MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407094358 · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s504439

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health and Health Care Experience in Those With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

2025· article· en· W4407094358 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Beate C. Sydora, Michaelann S. Wilke, Mahua Ghosh, Donna Vine

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Women s Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of AlbertaWomen and Children's Health Research InstituteChildren's Health Research Institute
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Health careVirologyInternal medicineDiseaseObesityOutbreakEconomic growthInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrine-metabolic disorder and is associated with a variety of health disorders. The management of PCOS requires a multidisciplinary health care approach. The COVID-19 pandemic affected access and delivery of health care. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on the health and health care experience of those affected by PCOS. Patients and Methods: An online survey was conducted January 2021 to July 2022 in Canada, open to anyone who identified as having PCOS. Data collected in REDCap included questions on demographics, symptoms, and experience of PCOS management during the pandemic. Results: The majority (59%) of respondents (n=194, mean age 34± 8 years) experienced pandemic-related employment changes and self-reported a high stress level (73± 21/100). Of those who reported changes in body weight, 58% gained weight, which they attributed to unhealthy eating habits and a lack of exercise during the pandemic, and 16% lost weight, which they credited to increased physical activity and a shift towards healthier eating habits. The respondents ascribed the impact of COVID-related changes to clinic cancellations, delayed appointments, long wait times for referrals and lab work, lack of access to exercise facilities and insufficient social support. Some respondents voluntarily reduced access to health care services to limit COVID exposure. COVID-19-related health status was perceived as more important than their own PCOS-related symptoms. Virtual appointments via telehealth were regarded as beneficial for 20% of users. Conclusion: Individuals with PCOS reported an overall reduction in COVID-related access to health care and supports. Some adapted to the use of telemedicine, while others experienced increased stress due to a lack of access to health care and an inability to manage their PCOS symptoms. The pandemic further highlighted that those with PCOS often experience a lack of accessibility to multidisciplinary health care and supports needed to manage their condition. Plain Language Summary: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex disorder affecting up to 18% of women and can impact overall health and quality of life across the lifespan. It is characterized by irregular menstrual cycles, heavy menstrual bleeding, male-pattern hair growth, and acne due to excess production of male hormones. PCOS is associated with an increased risk of infertility, pregnancy complications, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mental health disorders such as anxiety, depression, and negative self-image. Because of its complexity, PCOS requires a multidisciplinary health care approach including endocrinologists, gynecologists, dietician, exercise specialists, and psychologists/psychiatrists. In this paper, we describe the findings of a self-administered survey in those who self-reported having PCOS. The survey explores the patients’ view of the challenges in health care management during the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruptions in the delivery of health care and many patients struggled to find the support they needed. COVID-19 caused unprecedented challenges to the health care system but also presented opportunities for alternative health care delivery models. Our findings highlight the need to incorporate viable individualized and alternative care options for people with chronic conditions such as PCOS, to support self-management and prevent deterioration in health and well-being during times of unforeseen health crises. While the survey is restricted to respondents in Canada, the findings and proposed improvements provide distinct insights that are of international relevance as there is ample evidence of similar experiences regarding health care access and support during the COVID-19 pandemic around the world. Keywords: polycystic ovary syndrome, COVID-19, health care, telehealth, health supports, women’s health

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Women s HealthSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207