MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407098416 · doi:10.1080/10630732.2024.2444238

Bridging Data Governance and Socio-Technical Transitions to Understand Sustainable Smart Cities

2024· article· en· W4407098416 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Urban Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)Corporate governanceSociotechnical systemEnvironmental planningSustainable developmentBusinessRegional sciencePolitical scienceEconomic geographyEnvironmental resource managementGeographyComputer scienceKnowledge managementEnvironmental scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart city (SC) studies that have drawn on socio-technical transitions literature do not explicitly consider data governance (DG) as a significant component of smart city transitions (SCTs). This article works towards this gap by bridging the literature on DG and socio-technical transitions in SCs. We aim to answer two overarching questions: (1) What can SCTs learn from DG?; and (2) What can DG learn from SCTs? Against this backdrop, we outline the contours of a new research agenda that could bring together both fields in productive dialogue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it