MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407099725 · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.70098

Update on hazelnut allergy: Allergen characterization, epidemiology, food processing technique and detecting strategy

2025· review· en· W4407099725 on OpenAlexaff
Mukeshimana Camus‐Ela, Yue Wang, Gardiner Henric Rennie, Vijaya Raghavan, Jin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFood allergensFood allergyFood safetyFood processingBiotechnologyIdentification (biology)Food scienceAllergyMedicineBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hazelnuts are popular among people due to their dense nutrient component. However, eating them may be quite dangerous for those who are allergic. To improve food safety, this research examines current developments in the characterization, processing, and detection of hazelnut allergens. The identification and molecular knowledge of certain proteins that cause allergic responses are necessary for the characterization of hazelnut allergens. Proteomics and genomics are two techniques that have helped to advance our knowledge of hazelnut allergens and facilitate the creation of more precise diagnostic instruments. One important factor to reduce but not to eliminate the exposure to hazelnut allergens is food processing. The extractability of hazelnut proteins with regard to food processing plays a crucial role in determining allergenicity. Innovative technologies have been created to lessen allergenicity in foods containing hazelnuts while preserving their flavor and quality. These technologies include thermal and nonthermal processing techniques. To further safeguard consumers with hazelnut allergies, innovations in ingredient labeling and cross-contamination avoidance techniques have been put into place. For the purpose of management, if foods contain hazelnut, they must label it. Technological developments in analytical methods, including mass spectrometry, polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, have made it possible to identify hazelnut allergens with high specificity and sensitivity in a range of dietary matrices. Moreover, the advancement of point-of-care testing instruments presents the possibility of prompt on site identification, hence enhancing food safety for people with hazelnut allergies. The multidisciplinary efforts of researchers, food technologists, and allergists to enhance the safety of products containing hazelnuts are highlighted in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food SafetySame topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207