MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407103180 · doi:10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-33

Energy Distribution Effect on Bremsstrahlung Radiation Produced by \(B_{11}^{5}\) and \(Al_{27}^{13}\)

2025· article· en· W4407103180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCrystallography and Radiation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBremsstrahlungMathematicsRadiationEnergy (signal processing)Distribution (mathematics)Nuclear physicsPhysicsStatisticsMathematical analysisElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the Bethe-Heitler equation, this work determines the energy distribution of Bremsstrahlung radiation for \(B_{11}^{5}\) and \(Al_{27}^{13}\). We utilize the mathematical program "Mathematica" to contrast the electromagnetic impacts of photons resulting from interactions of electrons with boron and aluminum nuclei. We compare the effects of electric and magnetic cross-sections on the generation of Bremsstrahlung radiation. We will examine the impact of electric and magnetic fields on the production of Bremsstrahlung radiation using graphs. We also investigate the effect of atom mass on the emission of Bremsstrahlung radiation. According to our results, certain types of X-rays can be produced by using magnetic interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it