Infectious Subgenomic Amplicon Strategies for Japanese Encephalitis and West Nile Viruses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Classical methods for constructing infectious cDNA clones of flaviviruses are often hindered by instability and toxicity. The Infectious-Subgenomic-Amplicons (ISA) method is an advancement which utilizes overlapping DNA fragments representing viral genomic sequence and in-cell recombination to bypass bacterial plasmid assembly. However, the ISA method has limitations due to the toxicity of some ISA DNA fragments in bacteria during synthetic production. We validated modified ISA strategies for producing toxic ISA Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) DNA fragments. Three approaches were explored, including subdividing toxic DNA fragments into two sub-fragments for synthetic clonal production, using a low-copy bacterial plasmid, and subdividing the toxic DNA fragments into four short overlapping sub-fragments, each up to 1.8 kb. The latter novel approach in ISA applications enabled the synthesis of entirely bacteria-free ISA DNA fragments. Our results demonstrate that subdividing toxic fragments into sub-fragments smaller than 1.8 kb for synthesis is the efficient strategy, circumventing the need for bacterial plasmids and ensuring rapid production of synthetic flaviviruses. This method also shortens the production timeline. We also compared the efficacy of JEV and WNV ISA in zinc finger antiviral protein 1 (ZAP) wild-type and knockout cells and found that knockout cells may be more effective for ISA rescue of flaviviruses, including CpG-enriched strains for live attenuated vaccines. The validated modified ISA strategies provide an efficient approach for producing synthetic JEV and WNV. This will enable rapid research during outbreaks of emerging flaviviruses by facilitating the quick generation of new virus variants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".