MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407108856 · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01756

Stimulated Exciton–Polariton Scattering in Hybrid Halide Perovskites

2025· article· en· W4407108856 on OpenAlexaff
I. Yu. Chestnov, Mikhail Masharin, V. I. Kondratyev, Ivan Iorsh, A. K. Samusev, Anatoly P. Pushkarev, Sergey Makarov, I. A. Shelykh, V. Shahnazaryan

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Photonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersITMO UniversityMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationBasis Foundation
KeywordsHalideExcitonPolaritonScatteringMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsCondensed matter physicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halide perovskites such as methylammonium lead bromide (MAPbBr 3 ) host tightly bound three-dimensional excitons that are robust at room temperature. The excellent optical properties of MAPbBr 3 allow the design of optical single-mode waveguides and cavities in the frequency range close to excitonic transitions. Taken together, these results indicate that MAPbBr 3 is an excellent platform for probing exciton–polariton nonlinear phenomena at room temperature. Here, we investigate the ultrafast nonequilibrium dynamics of polaritons under nonresonant femtosecond-pulsed excitation. We demonstrate the presence of a stimulated acoustic phonon-assisted scattering regime above the threshold pump fluence, characterized by the explosive growth of emission intensity, a redshift of the emission spectral maximum, spectral narrowing, and subpicosecond emission dynamics. Our theoretical findings are confirmed by experimental measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS PhotonicsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207