Le droit d'accès à l'information environnementale au Maroc entre protection et restriction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le droit d'accès à l'information environnementale est l'un des piliers du modèle démocratique. Il contribue à l'amélioration de la performance de l'action publique en favorisant l'engagement des États envers les principes de gouvernance environnementale. Ce droit a pour finalité d'encourager la participation du public dans la prise de décisions environnementales. Conscient de l'importance de ce droit, le législateur marocain l'a doté de nombreuses garanties, au premier rang desquelles figure la garantie constitutionnelle. Cependant, ces garanties perdent de leur importance si elles ne sont pas conformes aux normes internationales pertinentes en matière de droit d'accès à l'information environnementale. Il en découle donc la nécessité d'analyser l'arsenal juridique marocain régissant l'application de ce droit, afin de déterminer dans quelle mesure le législateur marocain a réussi à garantir un exercice adéquat du droit d'accès à l'information environnementale, tout en conciliant les garanties et les restrictions prévues pour son exercice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".