Innovative Credit Risk Assessment: Leveraging Social Media Data for Inclusive Credit Scoring in Indonesia’s Fintech Sector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The financial technology domain has undertaken significant strides toward more inclusive credit scoring systems by integrating alternative data sources, prompting an exploration of how we can further simplify the process of efficiently assessing creditworthiness for the younger generation who lack traditional credit histories and collateral assets. This study introduces a novel approach leveraging social media analytics and advanced machine learning techniques to assess the creditworthiness of individuals without traditional credit histories and collateral assets. Conventional credit scoring methods tend to rely heavily on central bank credit information, especially traditional collateral assets such as property or savings accounts. We leverage demographics, personality, psycholinguistics, and social network data from LinkedIn profiles to develop predictive models for a comprehensive financial reliability assessment. Our credit scoring methods propose scoring models to produce continuous credit scores and classification models to categorize potential borrowers—particularly young individuals lacking traditional credit histories or collateral assets—as either good or bad credit risks based on expert judgment thresholds. This innovative approach questions conventional financial evaluation methods and enhances access to credit for marginalized communities. The research question addressed in this study is how to develop a credit scoring mechanism using social media data. This research contributes to the advancing fintech landscape by presenting a framework that has the potential to transform credit scoring practices to adapt to modern economic activities and digital footprints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".