De la plume au chandail orange : l’iconographie symbolique dans les mouvements sociaux autochtones au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, les Peuples autochtones représentent une minorité à part ayant subi des politiques d’assimilation culturelle et des discriminations. Aujourd’hui, ces Peuples victimes de pertes culturelles considérables se réunissent dans des mouvements communs dans lesquels ils déploient une iconographie protestataire singulière. Le but de cet article est de comprendre les logiques et les fonctions sous-jacentes de cette iconographie à travers l’étude de trois évènements qui se sont tenus à Montréal et Ottawa, à l’automne 2023. L’iconographie protestataire autochtone s’inscrit dans les codes de communication de la société majoritaire, tout en portant une signification pour les Autochtones. Les symboles visibles s’imposent comme des dispositifs de sensibilisation empreints d’une forte dimension émotionnelle permettant de maximiser les soutiens externes tout en contribuant à une mémoire collective autochtone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".