MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407129098 · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3536438

PDFormer: Efficient Vision Transformer for Photovoltaic Defect Detection

2025· article· en· W4407129098 on OpenAlexaff
Jianyuan Wang, Heng Du

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemTransformerElectrical engineeringComputer scienceElectronic engineeringVoltageComputer visionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In industrial production, the quality of photovoltaic determines the power generation efficiency and service life. Therefore, only by improving the quality inspection automation capability of photovoltaic products can we ensure the quality of mass production. Recently, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have shown excellent performance in various visual tasks. However, the ViTs generally suffer severe performance degradation when small-scale datasets are used for training since ViTs overfit quickly. To alleviate this, we propose PDFormer, a simple but effective Transformer framework towards efficient learning for photovoltaic defects detection. Our proposed PDFormer boosts the performance of the ViTs by compound improvements, which generally consists in three levels: data level, structure level, and supervision level. Specifically, an image mixing augmentation method called QuadMix augmentation is first proposed to randomly mix the positive and negative samples for the binary classification task. Besides, we develop a novel attention-based module to reweight the deep features by intermediate classification scores. Finally, we adopt both the ViT and CNN networks as the compound teacher networks to perform compositional multi-teacher knowledge distillation for the transformer student. Benefitted from the overall efficient designs, PDFormer significantly improves the detection performance of the transformer baseline on the dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that PDFormer achieves a top-1 accuracy of 98.08%, surpassing other competitive methods on the photovoltaic dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207