MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

VigilantAI: Real-time detection of anomalous activity from a video stream using deep learning

2024· article· en· W4407129318 on OpenAlexaff
Danish Javed, Usama Arshad, Shuhrabeel Peerzada, Muhammad Ramiz Saud, Nisar Ali, Raja Hashim Ali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningComputer visionReal-time computingComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) solutions are increasingly integrated into various sectors, we have utilized Artificial Intelligence for enhancing public safety through real-time detection of illegal activities such as robberies and threats at gunpoint using CCTV footage. With the proliferation of deep learning in object detection, the study focuses on deploying the YoloV5 model, trained on a custom dataset compiled from diverse CCTV sources and movies, to identify specific criminal actions. One of the major problems faced in this field is the availability of a large robust labeled dataset on which a deep learning model can be trained. For this purpose, we have created our own dataset by converting various CCTV footage and movies into images, and then labeling them with the correct class. In addition, we also augmented data by using various data augmentation techniques for the chosen images. This dataset, enriched through augmentation techniques and annotated with bounding boxes, allows for the precise detection of threats, achieving an accuracy rate of 85%. Our system stands out by not only spotting these activities but also by instantly alerting security personnel, facilitating a rapid response to potentially dangerous situations. This capability is important for law enforcement agencies worldwide, offering them an advanced tool to act swiftly and prevent crimes, thereby enhancing public security. The essence of our work demonstrates the practical application and significant impact of AI in bolstering security measures, providing a solid foundation for future enhancements in the field. Through this initiative, we aim to foster a safer environment in public spaces, reducing crime rates and increasing the general public’s sense of safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207