MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407132891 · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.02.022

Unique slip mechanisms and flow behavior during high-temperature deformation of additively manufactured high carbon stainless steel

2025· article· en· W4407132891 on OpenAlexafffund
Harveen Bongao, Jubert Pasco, Kudakwashe Nyamuchiwa, Clodualdo Aranas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Research and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersPhilippine Council for Industry, Energy, and Emerging Technology Research and DevelopmentNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNew Brunswick Innovation FoundationCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMaterials scienceSlip (aerodynamics)Deformation (meteorology)Composite materialMetallurgyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-temperature deformation experiments were performed on 420 stainless steels (AM420SS) fabricated using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology, both below and above its Ae 3 temperature ranging from 700 to 1150 °C and across two orders of magnitude of strain rates from 0.01 to 1 s −1 . Prior to the hot compressive tests, the reconstruction of parent austenite grains in the as-3D printed state was carried out, revealing that adjacent grains have similar alignment of primary slip systems along the building direction. The melt pool morphology and layered grain distribution of the as-3D printed AM420SS led to non-uniform texture development during hot compression, caused by the mismatch of dominant slip systems in different regions. Using the Kocks-Mecking (K-M) model, we found that dynamic recovery predominates at higher strain rates, while dynamic recrystallization becomes significant at lower strain rates and higher temperatures, as shown by reconstructed austenite grain sizes and recrystallization kinetics via the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) model. The activation energy of AM420SS was calculated to be 382 kJ/mol, with dislocation glide identified as the rate-determining deformation mechanism, indicated by an n value of 2.9. The prior austenite grain size increased while the shape factor decreased at higher temperatures, with a high density of stored energy constrained between growing austenite grains promoting preferential grain growth at lower strain rates. The findings from this work can guide the development of a combined net-shape fabrication technique with a high-temperature forming route to produce dense structures with controlled local texture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Research and TechnologySame topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207