Ability of upper airway metrics to predict obstructive sleep apnea severity: a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The lack of consensus regarding the association between airway narrowing and the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents a significant challenge in understanding and diagnosing this sleep disorder. The study aimed to systematically review the literature to investigate the relationship between upper airway measurements and the severity of OSA defined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched on 21 March 2023 for articles on OSA patients as diagnosed by polysomnography, investigating the correlation between upper airway measurements and AHI using cone-beam CT (CBCT) or multidetector CT (MDCT). Quality assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The results were subsequently synthesized descriptively. RESULTS: The database search identified 1253 results. Fourteen studies, encompassing 720 patients, met the eligibility criteria. Upper airway length showed moderate to weak positive correlation with AHI. Minimal cross-sectional area had varying correlations with AHI, ranging from strong negative to no correlation. Nasopharyngeal volumes showed moderate negative to weak correlations with AHI. Total upper airway volume ranged from strong negative to weak correlation with AHI. Other measurements exhibited weak or very weak correlations with AHI. CONCLUSIONS: Among the variables investigated, the minimal cross-sectional area and, to a lesser extent, the volume of the upper airway in OSA patients demonstrated the most promising correlation with the AHI. However, the preponderance of evidence suggests that upper airway length, cross-sectional area and volume as measured by CBCT or MDCT are weak predictors of OSA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".