MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407137733 · doi:10.46690/capi.2025.01.03

Investigation of effect and mechanism of active water and CO2 huff-and-puff on enhanced oil recovery in tight reservoirs

2025· article· en· W4407137733 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Chen, Jiayi Zhu, Japan Trivedi, Jianbin Liu, Shun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCapillarity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringMechanism (biology)Tight oilEnvironmental scienceGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energized huff and puff is a key technology for tight reservoirs. Active water and CO2 are two energized huff-and-puff media with great development potential, but their enhanced oil recovery (EOR) effects and the imbibition mechanism still need further experimental research. In this paper, short cores were spliced into long cores for energized huff-and-puff experiments. Combined with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) testing, the T2 spectra of different core sections changed with the huff-and-puff cycles, and then the EOR effects, limited effective distances, pore throat characteristics, and influencing factors of active water and CO2 energized huff-and-puff were evaluated. Meanwhile, a comparative experiment without well soaking in a specific huff-and-puff cycle was designed to quantitatively split the contribution rate of elastic displacement and imbibition displacement to EOR. The experimental results show that active water huff-and-puff mainly mobilizes crude oil in large pores, while CO2 huff-and-puff can simultaneously mobilize crude oil in small pores. The cumulative oil recovery of active water and CO2 after 4 cycles of Huff-and-Puff was 24.78% and 40.89%, respectively, and the limited effective distances were 6-8cm and 8-10cm, respectively. The stage recovery rate of active water and CO2 huff-and-puff significantly decreases with increased huff-and-puff rounds. The longer well soaking duration will result in a higher final oil recovery. Elastic displacement is the main contribution mechanism of active water and energized CO2 huff-and-puff, and imbibition displacement accounts for 20.86% and 31.52%, respectively. Due to its good diffusion and mass transfer ability, CO2 can more fully play the mechanism of imbibition displacement and further improve oil recovery. The research results of this paper can provide data support for the application of energized huff-and-puff in tight reservoirs. Document Type: Original article Cited as: Chen, X., Zhu, J., Chao, L., Trivedi, J., Liu, J., Liu, S. Investigation of effect and mechanism of active water and CO2 huff-and-puff on enhanced oil recovery in tight reservoirs. Capillarity, 2025, 14(1): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.46690/capi.2025.01.03

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCapillaritySame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207