MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407140708 · doi:10.3390/hydrology12020025

Coupling HEC-RAS and AI for River Morphodynamics Assessment Under Changing Flow Regimes: Enhancing Disaster Preparedness for the Ottawa River

2025· article· en· W4407140708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto and Region Conservation AuthorityUniversité LavalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBeach morphodynamicsPreparednessHydrology (agriculture)Flow (mathematics)GeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringSediment transportGeomorphologySedimentMechanicsPhysicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite significant advancements in flood forecasting using machine learning (ML) algorithms, recent events have revealed hydrological behaviors deviating from historical model development trends. The record-breaking 2019 flood in the Ottawa River basin, which exceeded the 100-year flood threshold, underscores the escalating impact of climate change on hydrological extremes. These unprecedented events highlight the limitations of traditional ML models, which rely heavily on historical data and often struggle to predict extreme floods that lack representation in past records. This calls for integrating more comprehensive datasets and innovative approaches to enhance model robustness and adaptability to changing climatic conditions. This study introduces the Next-Gen Group Method of Data Handling (Next-Gen GMDH), an innovative ML model leveraging second- and third-order polynomials to address the limitations of traditional ML models in predicting extreme flood events. Using HEC-RAS simulations, a synthetic dataset of river flow discharges was created, covering a wide range of potential future floods with return periods of up to 10,000 years, to enhance the accuracy and generalization of flood predictions under evolving climatic conditions. The Next-Gen GMDH addresses the complexity and limitations of standard GMDH by incorporating non-adjacent connections and optimizing intermediate layers, significantly reducing computational overhead while enhancing performance. The Gen GMDH demonstrated improved stability and tighter clustering of predictions, particularly for extreme flood scenarios. Testing results revealed exceptional predictive accuracy, with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values of 4.72% for channel width, 1.80% for channel depth, and 0.06% for water surface elevation. These results vastly outperformed the standard GMDH, which yielded MAPE values of 25.00%, 8.30%, and 0.11%, respectively. Additionally, computational complexity was reduced by approximately 40%, with a 33.88% decrease in the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for channel width and an impressive 581.82% improvement for channel depth. This methodology integrates hydrodynamic modeling with advanced ML, providing a robust framework for accurate flood prediction and adaptive floodplain management in a changing climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it