MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407141926 · doi:10.3390/metabo15020094

Metabolites and Free Fatty Acids in Japanese Black Beef During Wet Aging

2025· article· en· W4407141926 on OpenAlexaff
Shuji Ueda, Yuka Yoshida, Yuka Tateoka, Biniam Kebede, Masakazu Shinohara, Hiroki Nakanishi, Itsuko Fukuda, Yasuhito Shirai

Bibliographic record

VenueMetabolites · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersJapan Racing Association
KeywordsFood scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Japanese Black beef is known for its high intramuscular fat content, an important factor in its distinctive Wagyu aroma. Wet aging, which involves vacuum-packing meat and storing it at low temperatures, enhances flavor, texture, and tenderness and is essential for maintaining and improving meat quality. In this study, changes in metabolites and lipid profiles were investigated during the wet aging of Japanese Black and Holstein beef. Methods/Results: Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry identified 113 metabolites in Japanese Black beef and 94 in Holstein beef, with significant increases in metabolites like aspartic acid and maleic acid over the aging period. Regarding lipid composition, total free fatty acids significantly increased with wet aging, with Japanese Black beef showing significantly higher concentrations of oleic and linoleic acids than Holstein beef. Additionally, lipid analysis by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry revealed a reduction in specific phospholipids, particularly lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE), with notable decreases in LPC (18:1), LPC (18:2), LPE (18:1), and LPE (18:2). Conclusions: These results suggest that wet aging influences the stability of membrane lipids, facilitating the degradation of phospholipids into free fatty acids, and improving the flavor of Japanese Black beef.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetabolitesSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207