INCIDENCE RISK OF STROKE AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (CABG)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: “To determine the incidence risk of stroke after Cardiopulmonary Bypass Grafting (CABG) in Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar.” Methodology: The cross-sectional quantitative project was undertaken in the Cardiovascular Surgery Department of Lady Reading Hospital, KPK, Pakistan (LRH). The period of this study was six months. Data was collected from two hundred and twenty-one patients who were participants of the study. SPSS version 14 was used for data analysis. Stoke was stratified by gender and age to see the stratal effects. A p-value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant in the chi-square test after data stratification. Results: Two hundred and twenty one patients who had CABG in the cardiology unit of LRH were included in our study. The gender distribution of the participants was 1.63:1 male to female with the average age of the participants being 64.79 years +7.79SD with a range of 50-80 years. The stroke in patients after CABG was observed in 17(7.69%). Conclusion: We found in our study that the incidence of post-CABG stroke is common after 55 years of age. Whereas stroke incidence increases further in patients who get an MI within a day of surgery
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".