Lightyears: Auditory Navigation through Coppice’s <i>Draw Agreement</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Elucidating the structure of its retrospective triptych Draw Agreement (2023), Coppice (Noé Cuéllar and Joseph Kramer) overviews the techniques driving its musical experimentation between 2009 and 2022. Rich in sound, musical, technological, and listening concepts, these notes serve to accompany the navigation of Coppice’s music as referenced from the three-part construct, while pointing to other related works. Through documentation and metaphor, Coppice’s sonic thinking identifies recurring themes, culminating in a spatiotemporal synthesis of actuality and simulation in an increasing convolution of auditory reflexivity. In parceling this 13-year experimental musical object, Coppice attains and continues building upon an auditory perspective that engages postphenomenological embodiment, shifting spatiotemporal values and creative mediative processes reflective of artistic, technological, and auditory cultures today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".