Le care dans le quotidien de personnes professionnelles de la petite enfance œuvrant dans trois contextes éducatifs au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le care est omniprésent dans le quotidien des personnes professionnelles qui œuvrent dans les milieux éducatifs de la petite enfance. Or, le care peine à être rendu visible, plaçant ainsi dans l’ombre une partie importante du travail de ces personnes professionnelles. Cet article vise à apporter un éclairage sur les manifestations quotidiennes du care dans le travail éducatif accompli auprès de jeunes enfants au Québec selon la perspective de personnes professionnelles concernées. Les résultats sont tirés d’entretiens semi-dirigés et proviennent d’une étude qualitative portant sur les contextes éducatifs offerts aux enfants de 4 ans au Québec. L’analyse montre que le care transcende les actions posées par les personnes professionnelles et qu’il s’actualise à travers cinq phases indissociables pour répondre aux besoins des jeunes enfants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".