MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407160734 · doi:10.5751/ace-02798-200106

Quantifying rosy-finch migration with stable hydrogen isotope feather markers highlights the need for inter-state collaboration to reach conservation goals

2025· article· en· W4407160734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caitlin J. Campbell, Clark S. Rushing, Cooper Farr, Russell E. Norvell, Kim Savides

Bibliographic record

VenueAvian Conservation and Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyUtah Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah State University
KeywordsFeatherFinchEcologyGeographyEnvironmental resource managementBiologyEvolutionary biologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Black Rosy-Finch Leucosticte atrata is a species of conservation concern because their alpine breeding habitat is threatened by climate change and their population size is relatively small. Rosy-finches are notoriously difficult to study and information gaps include migratory connectivity across their range. In Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming, Black Rosy-Finches can be found throughout the year and it is unknown if these populations are short-distance altitudinal migrants or are traveling to and from other regions. Understanding a species’ full annual cycle can improve conservation and management between states and management entities. To understand migration patterns, we measured stable hydrogen isotopes from feathers of Black Rosy-Finches that were using three mountain sites in Utah during the non-breeding season. Samples from Gray-crowned Rosy-Finches Leucosticte tephrocotis were also included to support validation of methods. From each sample, we produced odds of origin surfaces that allowed us to summarize the distance and direction traveled between the location where feathers were formed and their collection site during the non-breeding season. Stable hydrogen isotope values of feather samples from 38 Black Rosy-Finches ranged -113.71‰ to -37.03‰ and probable breeding-season origins of these birds included central Idaho, southwestern Montana, western Wyoming, and the Uinta Mountains of Utah. Black Rosy-Finches traveled on average (median) 428 km between breeding and non-breeding locations. These results suggest that northern Utah’s wintering Black Rosy-Finches migrate regionally between breeding and non-breeding sites rather than making local-scale altitudinal migrations from nearby breeding sites within Utah. Managers and conservationists across state boundaries need to ensure they are providing habitat resources to sustain Black Rosy-Finches across the annual cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvian Conservation and EcologySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207