MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Network Intrusion Detection System Based on Separable Convolution AutoEncoder with Long Short-Term Memory

2024· article· en· W4407169756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fulin Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderConvolution (computer science)Term (time)Computer scienceSeparable spaceIntrusion detection systemArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, Intrusion Detection System (IDS) that continuously detects, analyzed network traffic for signs of malicious activity by enabling prompt detection and response to potential security incidents. Traditional approaches IDS had faced several challenges which include high false positive rates, limited detection capability. Therefore, this research proposes Separable Convolution AutoEncoder-Long Short-Term Memory (SCAE-LSTM) for network intrusion detection system. Initially, data is taken from Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity Intrusion Detection System (CICIDS) 2018 dataset is preprocessed by using t-Distributed Stochastic Neighboring Embedding (t-SNE) which reduces effectively in high-dimensional network traffic data to a lower dimensional representation. Then, the features are extracted from preprocessed data by using Local Linear Embedding (LLE) which identified nonlinear structures and anomalies that indicated in the network intrusions. After that, classification is done by using SCAE to complex patterns and anomalies in traffic data. Finally, the network intrusions are detected by using LSTM which effectively improves accuracy, reduces false positives, enhances the overall robustness in intrusion detection system. The proposed SCAE-LSTM achieved better accuracy (0.9755), detection rate (0.9999), F1 value (0.9575) and false positive rate (0.0128) when compared with existing CNN-LSTM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207