Using multiomic integration to improve blood biomarkers of major depressive disorder: a case-control study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability, with a twofold increase in prevalence in women compared to men. Over the last few years, identifying molecular biomarkers of MDD has proven challenging, reflecting interactions among multiple environmental and genetic factors. Recently, epigenetic processes have been proposed as mediators of such interactions, with the potential for biomarker development. METHODS: We characterised gene expression and two mechanisms of epigenomic regulation, DNA methylation (DNAm) and microRNAs (miRNAs), in blood samples from a cohort of individuals with MDD and healthy controls (n = 169). Case-control comparisons were conducted for each omic layer. We also defined gene coexpression networks, followed by step-by-step annotations across omic layers. Third, we implemented an advanced multiomic integration strategy, with covariate correction and feature selection embedded in a cross-validation procedure. Performance of MDD prediction was systematically compared across 6 methods for dimensionality reduction, and for every combination of 1, 2 or 3 types of molecular data. Feature stability was further assessed by bootstrapping. FINDINGS: Results showed that molecular and coexpression changes associated with MDD were highly sex-specific and that the performance of MDD prediction was greater when the female and male cohorts were analysed separately, rather than combined. Importantly, they also demonstrated that performance progressively increased with the number of molecular datasets considered. INTERPRETATION: Informational gain from multiomic integration had already been documented in other medical fields. Our results pave the way toward similar advances in molecular psychiatry, and have practical implications for developing clinically useful MDD biomarkers. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (contract UPR3212), the University of Strasbourg, the Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, the Université Paris Cité, the Fondation de France (FdF N° Engt:00081244 and 00148126; ECI, IY, RB, PEL), the French National Research Agency (ANR-18-CE37-0002, BE, CMC, ADD, PEL, ECI; ANR-18-CE17-0009, ADD; ANR-19-CE37-0010, PEL; ANR-21-RHUS-009, ADD, BE, CMC, CCB; ANR-22-PESN-0013, ADD), the Fondation pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau (FRC 2019, PEL), Fondation de France (2018, BE, CMC, ADD) and American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP YIG-1-102-19; PEL).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".