Giftedness and talent: What educators and psychologists need to know By FranzisPreckel, MiriamVock, PaulaOlszewski‐Kubilius. Newburyport: Hogrefe Publishing GmbH. 2024. pp. 242. $57.00 (paperback). ISBN: 9780889376274
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The book Giftedness and Talent: What Educators and Psychologists Need to Know, written by Franzis Preckel, Miriam Vock, and Paula Olszewski-Kubilius, provides a comprehensive examination of giftedness, emphasizing both the theoretical frameworks and research methodologies that intersect within the domains of education and psychology. This review synthesizes the central themes of the book while analyzing its contributions, strengths, and weaknesses from an educator's perspective. Chapter One introduces various theoretical frameworks for understanding giftedness, including unidimensional, multidimensional, and systemic models. The authors argue that giftedness should be viewed as a multifaceted construct, encompassing cognitive, social, and emotional aspects, rather than just a measure of intelligence. This perspective influences both the conceptualization of giftedness and the research methodologies used in the field, setting the stage for later discussions on the identification of gifted students. Chapter Two deepens this theoretical analysis by exploring the methodologies employed in three landmark longitudinal studies of giftedness: the Marburg Giftedness Project, the Terman Study of Giftedness, and the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY). This chapter is crucial for understanding the methodological strengths and challenges of each study, providing insights into how these challenges can be addressed by further advance research in the field. The Terman Study, conducted from 1921 to 1999, employed interviews, questionnaires, and standardized tests to track participants over their lifetimes. While the Terman Study included informal support interventions, it lacked a formal control group. In contrast, the SMPY pioneered the talent search model by identifying top-performing students through above-grade-level testing. This study offered extensive multi-year support, tracking participants' academic and career progress over several decades. The Marburg Giftedness Project, initiated in the 1970s in Germany, included a control group for comparison and utilized teacher nominations as well as IQ tests to identify gifted students. It focused on observational data across cognitive, academic, and psychological domains without direct intervention. Each of the three studies employed a longitudinal approach along with various data collection methods to explore different aspects of giftedness and its outcomes, making significant contributions to the field of gifted education. The book's second half is more oriented to educators; it focuses on how they can recognize and support gifted children. Chapter Three talks about teachers' implicit theories about gifted students, or teachers' beliefs about gifted students' abilities, personality traits, and development. Then, families with gifted children were put in the spotlight—especially the gifted children from lower-income families and ethnic minority groups. Chapter Four presented assessment strategies for the identification of minoritized gifted students as well as strategies for the identification of gifted underachievers. Finally, Chapter Five examines how teachers can support gifted children at schools, describing the four pillars of school-based support for gifted students: (1) differentiation within the classroom, (2) acceleration, (3) enrichment, and (4) special classes and schools. It serves as an essential evidence-based information for novice and veteran teachers serving gifted students across grade levels. Overall, the book's strengths significantly outweigh its weaknesses. One of the strengths is the extensive recompilation of empirical studies in various countries such as the United States, Canada, Austria, and Germany. This comprehensive coverage provides readers with a wealth of knowledge and insights. Another strength of the book is that it fully covers the topics of gifted underachievers, underachievement recognition, and ways to support them, creating a guide for teachers to support these students properly. In addition, while teachers often receive general examples and broad strategies for supporting gifted students, this book stands out by presenting concrete approaches specially designed for gifted learners in all levels of education. For instance, the book describes the adequate formation of groups to challenge gifted students and the proper implementation of differentiation within the classroom as a response to individual characteristics. From an educator's perspective, giftedness can be expressed in different areas or domains, displaying extraordinary capabilities in athletics and visual or performing arts. Therefore, a weakness of the book is that it focuses only on intellectual giftedness, ignoring giftedness in other areas, such as music or sports, which are also important for students in the current public school system. Including sections on these areas could provide a more holistic view of giftedness and address the diverse needs of students in the public-school system. The book contributes to the field of gifted education by highlighting the underrepresentation of gifted students from low socioeconomic backgrounds and ethnic minority groups. This focus on underrepresented students fosters a sense of empathy and inclusivity among the readers, encouraging them to consider the needs of all gifted students. The book generates awareness about the propensity of teachers to overlook gifted underachievers based on the child's age, gender, and social background. As expressed by the authors, “In the US, there is ample research to indicate that students from low-income backgrounds and some ethnic-racial subgroups … are underrepresented in gifted programs” (p. 110). Therefore, the book also suggests methods to help teachers identify underachievement as early as possible by utilizing statistical and nomination methods. As argued in the book, good teachers are essential for the diagnosis and support of gifted students, especially gifted girls, children from low socioeconomic backgrounds, or minority groups who often suffer from false stereotypes. Therefore, the book Giftedness and Talent: What Educators and Psychologists Need to Know is vital for educators since it calls for reflection on teaching practices and analysis of prejudices that impede the recognition of giftedness for specific student groups, including minorities. Jesus Villa is a Lecturer II in Science Education at the University of New Mexico (UNM) and a current student in the STEM Education strand of the Teaching Learning and Culture (TLC) program at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). With 8 years of experience teaching Science and Math across various grade levels, he brings a unique perspective to his work, especially in understanding the needs of gifted and talented students. Jesus combines his passion for education with a love for literature, offering thoughtful and insightful book reviews that bridge the worlds of teaching, reading, and the development of exceptional learners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".