MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407189564 · doi:10.1353/phx.2024.a951142

A Fresh Start for Editing the Latin Physiognomoniae Liber

2024· article· fr· W4407189564 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jarrett T. Welsh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansArtHumanitiesHistoryPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Editors have treated Liège, Bibliothèque de l’Université, ms 77 (= L) as the best witness to the Latin Physiognomoniae liber . That manuscript is instead interpolated, combining two different versions of a text whose relationship has not been determined. That fact undermines the stemma on which modern editions are based. Abstract: Les éditeurs ont traité le manuscrit 77 de la Bibliothèque de l’Université de Liège (= L) comme la meilleure source se rapportant au Traité de Physiognomonie (Anonyme Latin). En réalité, ce manuscrit a souffert d’interpolations : il combine deux versions différentes d’un texte dont la relation exacte n’a pas été déterminée. Ce constat ébranle les fondements sur lesquels les éditions modernes reposent

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicLinguistics and language evolutionFrench-language works237,207